NEUBERGER BERMAN PORTER'S FIVE FORCES TEMPLATE RESEARCH
Elevate Your Analysis with the Complete Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Neuberger Berman faces moderate buyer power, intense rivalry among asset managers, and regulatory tailwinds that both constrain and protect margins-while technology and scale shape barriers to entry and supplier dynamics.
This brief snapshot only scratches the surface. Unlock the full Porter's Five Forces Analysis to explore Neuberger Berman's competitive dynamics, market pressures, and strategic advantages in detail.
Suppliers Bargaining Power
Specialized Investment Talent and Key Personnel
Neuberger Berman depends on specialized portfolio managers and analysts for alpha; being independent and 100% employee-owned helps retain talent, but the market is tight-U.S. asset-management industry saw 12% turnover for senior PMs in 2025 and top hires command 25-50% pay premiums versus peers.
Financial Data and Analytics Terminal Providers
Data is the lifeblood of investing, and terminals like Bloomberg, FactSet, and MSCI command leverage over Neuberger Berman by supplying critical pricing, ESG, and risk feeds-Bloomberg's 2025 terminal revenue totaled $11.5B, underscoring vendor scale and pricing power.
These providers use subscription models with high switching costs; industry surveys show average migration costs exceed $5M and take 6-12 months, locking asset managers into multi-year contracts.
As Neuberger Berman scales AI-driven strategies, its reliance on proprietary, low-latency data increases-greater data needs raise vendor bargaining power and reduce negotiating leverage on price and terms.
Cloud Infrastructure and AI Compute Providers
By early 2026, cloud-native platforms made Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure critical suppliers to Neuberger Berman, supplying >70% of enterprise-grade GPU/CPU capacity used for ML and simulations.
Their control of NVIDIA A100/H100 instances and region-specific availability drives vendor leverage over pricing and SLAs.
Estimated migration costs for Neuberger Berman's petabyte-scale datasets exceed $50-120 million, creating a high switching barrier and limiting fee negotiation.
Regulatory and Compliance Service Vendors
Neuberger Berman depends on specialized regulatory and compliance vendors as US and EU ESG and private-market disclosure rules tightened; in 2025 over 70% of large asset managers report increased spend on compliance tech and advisory, raising supplier leverage.
These vendors certify controls and audit trails critical to meet SEC and EU SFDR/CSRD-like rules; a single compliance lapse risks multi-billion-dollar reputational and regulatory costs, so providers command premium fees.
High technical barriers, scarce expertise, and asymmetric liability give suppliers strong bargaining power, limiting Neuberger Berman's ability to push down rates or switch quickly.
- 2025: >70% of large managers increased compliance spend
- Key rules: US SEC private-funds reforms, EU CSRD/SFDR extensions
- Single failure: potential multi-$bn impact on AUM reputation
- Specialist firms charge premiums; switching costs high
Third-Party Distribution Platforms and Sub-Advisors
Neuberger Berman's direct channels are strong, but wirehouses and retail platforms still gatekeep access to US individual investors, influencing flows into its $427 billion global AUM (FY2025).
These platforms can boost or bury funds via 'recommended' lists, swinging quarterly AUM and fee revenue-platform delistings cost asset managers 5-15% AUM loss within 12 months on average.
- Relies on external platforms for retail reach
- Platforms control product visibility and client flows
- FY2025 AUM: $427 billion; fee impact tied to platform positioning
- Platform delisting often cuts AUM 5-15% within a year
Suppliers Hold the Cards: High Pay, Data & Cloud Leverage Squeeze Neuberger Berman
Suppliers (talent, data terminals, cloud/GPU, compliance vendors, platforms) hold strong bargaining power over Neuberger Berman-high pay premiums (25-50%), Bloomberg revenue $11.5B (2025), cloud/GPU dependency >70%, dataset migration $50-120M, FY2025 AUM $427B; switching costs and regulatory risk keep supplier leverage high.
| Supplier | Key metric (2025) |
|---|---|
| Talent | 25-50% pay premium |
| Data terminals | Bloomberg rev $11.5B |
| Cloud/GPU | >70% capacity; migration $50-120M |
| Compliance tech | >70% managers ↑spend |
| Platforms | AUM $427B; delist -5-15% |
What is included in the product
Detailed Word Document
Concise Porter's Five Forces assessment of Neuberger Berman highlighting competitive rivalry, client bargaining power, supplier influence, threat of new entrants and substitutes, and identifying regulatory and technological disruptors that affect its fee margins and market positioning.
Customizable Excel Spreadsheet
A concise Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces snapshot that highlights competitive pressures and strategic levers-perfect for rapid portfolio or deal assessment.
Customers Bargaining Power
Institutional Client Fee Sensitivity and Mandates
Pension funds and endowments increasingly reject traditional active fees as passive ETFs control $10.5 trillion in US AUM (2025), forcing Neuberger Berman to cut fees; median active fee discounts reached 35% in 2025 for large mandates.
Large institutional buyers exert leverage to secure customized fee schedules and most-favored-nation clauses, reducing gross margins-Neuberger Berman reported investment management fee pressure in FY2025 with net margin contraction of ~120 bps versus 2024.
By 2026 these clients demand granular transparency and tailored reporting; servicing costs rose ~8% in 2025 for peer firms, forcing Neuberger Berman to deliver more reporting and client servicing at similar or lower fees.
Growth of the Outsourced CIO Model
The rise of the Outsourced CIO (OCIO) means Neuberger Berman often sells to sophisticated intermediaries that aggregate $2.5+ trillion industry-wide (2025 est.), not end-client boards, so pricing and mandate terms face institutional scrutiny.
OCIO firms run rigorous RFPs-winning managers are measured on fee compression and track record-forcing Neuberger Berman to accept tighter fees and bespoke reporting.
Consolidation gives OCIOs significant leverage: top 50 OCIOs control an estimated 60% of outsourced assets in 2025, shifting bargaining power toward intermediaries.
Retail Investor Mobility and Digital Platforms
Retail investor mobility rises as 2025 data show 76% of U.S. retail investors use zero-commission or robo platforms and $4.5 trillion flows through digital brokerages, so Neuberger Berman faces lower loyalty and faster redemptions.
Real-time fee and performance comparison tools mean clients can shift assets in minutes; industry churn rates hit 18% in 2025, forcing Neuberger Berman to continuously demonstrate outperformance and justify its fees.
Demand for Bespoke and Private Market Access
Wealthy individuals and family offices now demand private equity and private credit once limited to institutions, shifting bargaining power toward customers seeking uncorrelated returns; Neuberger Berman reported Alternatives AUM of $207 billion in FY2025, exposing a need to scale bespoke offerings quickly.
If Neuberger Berman misses niche outcomes, clients may flee to boutiques: 2024 HNW allocations to alternatives rose to 18% (Capgemini), up from 12% in 2019, underscoring urgency to innovate or lose fee-rich mandates.
- Alternatives AUM: $207bn (FY2025)
- HNW alt allocations: 18% (2024)
- Risk: client migration to boutiques
ESG and Values-Based Investment Requirements
Buyers now demand ESG-aligned mandates; 67% of global institutional investors in 2025 factor ESG into manager selection, so Neuberger Berman faces immediate mandate loss if criteria aren't met.
Major clients can withdraw mandates quickly-$200B+ of institutional AUM is sensitive to ESG terms-shifting negotiation power to customers.
Customers now set investment philosophy via contract terms, forcing NB to embed ESG across product lines or risk revenue hits.
- 67% of institutions use ESG in manager selection (2025)
- $200B+ AUM exposed to strict ESG mandates
- Immediate mandate withdrawal risk
OCIO Power Crushes Fees: 35% Discounts, $207B Alternatives & ESG Mandate Risk
Institutional buyers and OCIOs wield strong leverage-top 50 OCIOs control ~60% of outsourced assets (2025)-forcing Neuberger Berman to accept ~35% median fee discounts and bespoke reporting; Alternatives AUM $207bn (FY2025) and 67% of institutions use ESG screens, so mandate loss risk is material.
| Metric | 2024/25 |
|---|---|
| Alternatives AUM | $207bn (FY2025) |
| Passive US AUM | $10.5tn (2025) |
| Median fee discount | 35% (2025) |
| OCIO concentration | Top50 = 60% (2025) |
| Institutions using ESG | 67% (2025) |
Preview Before You Purchase
Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces Analysis
This preview shows the exact Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces analysis you'll receive immediately after purchase-no placeholders or samples; it's the full, professionally formatted document, ready for download and use the moment you buy.
Original: $10.00
-65%$10.00
$3.50NEUBERGER BERMAN PORTER'S FIVE FORCES TEMPLATE RESEARCH
Elevate Your Analysis with the Complete Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Neuberger Berman faces moderate buyer power, intense rivalry among asset managers, and regulatory tailwinds that both constrain and protect margins-while technology and scale shape barriers to entry and supplier dynamics.
This brief snapshot only scratches the surface. Unlock the full Porter's Five Forces Analysis to explore Neuberger Berman's competitive dynamics, market pressures, and strategic advantages in detail.
Suppliers Bargaining Power
Specialized Investment Talent and Key Personnel
Neuberger Berman depends on specialized portfolio managers and analysts for alpha; being independent and 100% employee-owned helps retain talent, but the market is tight-U.S. asset-management industry saw 12% turnover for senior PMs in 2025 and top hires command 25-50% pay premiums versus peers.
Financial Data and Analytics Terminal Providers
Data is the lifeblood of investing, and terminals like Bloomberg, FactSet, and MSCI command leverage over Neuberger Berman by supplying critical pricing, ESG, and risk feeds-Bloomberg's 2025 terminal revenue totaled $11.5B, underscoring vendor scale and pricing power.
These providers use subscription models with high switching costs; industry surveys show average migration costs exceed $5M and take 6-12 months, locking asset managers into multi-year contracts.
As Neuberger Berman scales AI-driven strategies, its reliance on proprietary, low-latency data increases-greater data needs raise vendor bargaining power and reduce negotiating leverage on price and terms.
Cloud Infrastructure and AI Compute Providers
By early 2026, cloud-native platforms made Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure critical suppliers to Neuberger Berman, supplying >70% of enterprise-grade GPU/CPU capacity used for ML and simulations.
Their control of NVIDIA A100/H100 instances and region-specific availability drives vendor leverage over pricing and SLAs.
Estimated migration costs for Neuberger Berman's petabyte-scale datasets exceed $50-120 million, creating a high switching barrier and limiting fee negotiation.
Regulatory and Compliance Service Vendors
Neuberger Berman depends on specialized regulatory and compliance vendors as US and EU ESG and private-market disclosure rules tightened; in 2025 over 70% of large asset managers report increased spend on compliance tech and advisory, raising supplier leverage.
These vendors certify controls and audit trails critical to meet SEC and EU SFDR/CSRD-like rules; a single compliance lapse risks multi-billion-dollar reputational and regulatory costs, so providers command premium fees.
High technical barriers, scarce expertise, and asymmetric liability give suppliers strong bargaining power, limiting Neuberger Berman's ability to push down rates or switch quickly.
- 2025: >70% of large managers increased compliance spend
- Key rules: US SEC private-funds reforms, EU CSRD/SFDR extensions
- Single failure: potential multi-$bn impact on AUM reputation
- Specialist firms charge premiums; switching costs high
Third-Party Distribution Platforms and Sub-Advisors
Neuberger Berman's direct channels are strong, but wirehouses and retail platforms still gatekeep access to US individual investors, influencing flows into its $427 billion global AUM (FY2025).
These platforms can boost or bury funds via 'recommended' lists, swinging quarterly AUM and fee revenue-platform delistings cost asset managers 5-15% AUM loss within 12 months on average.
- Relies on external platforms for retail reach
- Platforms control product visibility and client flows
- FY2025 AUM: $427 billion; fee impact tied to platform positioning
- Platform delisting often cuts AUM 5-15% within a year
Suppliers Hold the Cards: High Pay, Data & Cloud Leverage Squeeze Neuberger Berman
Suppliers (talent, data terminals, cloud/GPU, compliance vendors, platforms) hold strong bargaining power over Neuberger Berman-high pay premiums (25-50%), Bloomberg revenue $11.5B (2025), cloud/GPU dependency >70%, dataset migration $50-120M, FY2025 AUM $427B; switching costs and regulatory risk keep supplier leverage high.
| Supplier | Key metric (2025) |
|---|---|
| Talent | 25-50% pay premium |
| Data terminals | Bloomberg rev $11.5B |
| Cloud/GPU | >70% capacity; migration $50-120M |
| Compliance tech | >70% managers ↑spend |
| Platforms | AUM $427B; delist -5-15% |
What is included in the product
Detailed Word Document
Concise Porter's Five Forces assessment of Neuberger Berman highlighting competitive rivalry, client bargaining power, supplier influence, threat of new entrants and substitutes, and identifying regulatory and technological disruptors that affect its fee margins and market positioning.
Customizable Excel Spreadsheet
A concise Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces snapshot that highlights competitive pressures and strategic levers-perfect for rapid portfolio or deal assessment.
Customers Bargaining Power
Institutional Client Fee Sensitivity and Mandates
Pension funds and endowments increasingly reject traditional active fees as passive ETFs control $10.5 trillion in US AUM (2025), forcing Neuberger Berman to cut fees; median active fee discounts reached 35% in 2025 for large mandates.
Large institutional buyers exert leverage to secure customized fee schedules and most-favored-nation clauses, reducing gross margins-Neuberger Berman reported investment management fee pressure in FY2025 with net margin contraction of ~120 bps versus 2024.
By 2026 these clients demand granular transparency and tailored reporting; servicing costs rose ~8% in 2025 for peer firms, forcing Neuberger Berman to deliver more reporting and client servicing at similar or lower fees.
Growth of the Outsourced CIO Model
The rise of the Outsourced CIO (OCIO) means Neuberger Berman often sells to sophisticated intermediaries that aggregate $2.5+ trillion industry-wide (2025 est.), not end-client boards, so pricing and mandate terms face institutional scrutiny.
OCIO firms run rigorous RFPs-winning managers are measured on fee compression and track record-forcing Neuberger Berman to accept tighter fees and bespoke reporting.
Consolidation gives OCIOs significant leverage: top 50 OCIOs control an estimated 60% of outsourced assets in 2025, shifting bargaining power toward intermediaries.
Retail Investor Mobility and Digital Platforms
Retail investor mobility rises as 2025 data show 76% of U.S. retail investors use zero-commission or robo platforms and $4.5 trillion flows through digital brokerages, so Neuberger Berman faces lower loyalty and faster redemptions.
Real-time fee and performance comparison tools mean clients can shift assets in minutes; industry churn rates hit 18% in 2025, forcing Neuberger Berman to continuously demonstrate outperformance and justify its fees.
Demand for Bespoke and Private Market Access
Wealthy individuals and family offices now demand private equity and private credit once limited to institutions, shifting bargaining power toward customers seeking uncorrelated returns; Neuberger Berman reported Alternatives AUM of $207 billion in FY2025, exposing a need to scale bespoke offerings quickly.
If Neuberger Berman misses niche outcomes, clients may flee to boutiques: 2024 HNW allocations to alternatives rose to 18% (Capgemini), up from 12% in 2019, underscoring urgency to innovate or lose fee-rich mandates.
- Alternatives AUM: $207bn (FY2025)
- HNW alt allocations: 18% (2024)
- Risk: client migration to boutiques
ESG and Values-Based Investment Requirements
Buyers now demand ESG-aligned mandates; 67% of global institutional investors in 2025 factor ESG into manager selection, so Neuberger Berman faces immediate mandate loss if criteria aren't met.
Major clients can withdraw mandates quickly-$200B+ of institutional AUM is sensitive to ESG terms-shifting negotiation power to customers.
Customers now set investment philosophy via contract terms, forcing NB to embed ESG across product lines or risk revenue hits.
- 67% of institutions use ESG in manager selection (2025)
- $200B+ AUM exposed to strict ESG mandates
- Immediate mandate withdrawal risk
OCIO Power Crushes Fees: 35% Discounts, $207B Alternatives & ESG Mandate Risk
Institutional buyers and OCIOs wield strong leverage-top 50 OCIOs control ~60% of outsourced assets (2025)-forcing Neuberger Berman to accept ~35% median fee discounts and bespoke reporting; Alternatives AUM $207bn (FY2025) and 67% of institutions use ESG screens, so mandate loss risk is material.
| Metric | 2024/25 |
|---|---|
| Alternatives AUM | $207bn (FY2025) |
| Passive US AUM | $10.5tn (2025) |
| Median fee discount | 35% (2025) |
| OCIO concentration | Top50 = 60% (2025) |
| Institutions using ESG | 67% (2025) |
Preview Before You Purchase
Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces Analysis
This preview shows the exact Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces analysis you'll receive immediately after purchase-no placeholders or samples; it's the full, professionally formatted document, ready for download and use the moment you buy.
Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Description
Elevate Your Analysis with the Complete Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Neuberger Berman faces moderate buyer power, intense rivalry among asset managers, and regulatory tailwinds that both constrain and protect margins-while technology and scale shape barriers to entry and supplier dynamics.
This brief snapshot only scratches the surface. Unlock the full Porter's Five Forces Analysis to explore Neuberger Berman's competitive dynamics, market pressures, and strategic advantages in detail.
Suppliers Bargaining Power
Specialized Investment Talent and Key Personnel
Neuberger Berman depends on specialized portfolio managers and analysts for alpha; being independent and 100% employee-owned helps retain talent, but the market is tight-U.S. asset-management industry saw 12% turnover for senior PMs in 2025 and top hires command 25-50% pay premiums versus peers.
Financial Data and Analytics Terminal Providers
Data is the lifeblood of investing, and terminals like Bloomberg, FactSet, and MSCI command leverage over Neuberger Berman by supplying critical pricing, ESG, and risk feeds-Bloomberg's 2025 terminal revenue totaled $11.5B, underscoring vendor scale and pricing power.
These providers use subscription models with high switching costs; industry surveys show average migration costs exceed $5M and take 6-12 months, locking asset managers into multi-year contracts.
As Neuberger Berman scales AI-driven strategies, its reliance on proprietary, low-latency data increases-greater data needs raise vendor bargaining power and reduce negotiating leverage on price and terms.
Cloud Infrastructure and AI Compute Providers
By early 2026, cloud-native platforms made Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure critical suppliers to Neuberger Berman, supplying >70% of enterprise-grade GPU/CPU capacity used for ML and simulations.
Their control of NVIDIA A100/H100 instances and region-specific availability drives vendor leverage over pricing and SLAs.
Estimated migration costs for Neuberger Berman's petabyte-scale datasets exceed $50-120 million, creating a high switching barrier and limiting fee negotiation.
Regulatory and Compliance Service Vendors
Neuberger Berman depends on specialized regulatory and compliance vendors as US and EU ESG and private-market disclosure rules tightened; in 2025 over 70% of large asset managers report increased spend on compliance tech and advisory, raising supplier leverage.
These vendors certify controls and audit trails critical to meet SEC and EU SFDR/CSRD-like rules; a single compliance lapse risks multi-billion-dollar reputational and regulatory costs, so providers command premium fees.
High technical barriers, scarce expertise, and asymmetric liability give suppliers strong bargaining power, limiting Neuberger Berman's ability to push down rates or switch quickly.
- 2025: >70% of large managers increased compliance spend
- Key rules: US SEC private-funds reforms, EU CSRD/SFDR extensions
- Single failure: potential multi-$bn impact on AUM reputation
- Specialist firms charge premiums; switching costs high
Third-Party Distribution Platforms and Sub-Advisors
Neuberger Berman's direct channels are strong, but wirehouses and retail platforms still gatekeep access to US individual investors, influencing flows into its $427 billion global AUM (FY2025).
These platforms can boost or bury funds via 'recommended' lists, swinging quarterly AUM and fee revenue-platform delistings cost asset managers 5-15% AUM loss within 12 months on average.
- Relies on external platforms for retail reach
- Platforms control product visibility and client flows
- FY2025 AUM: $427 billion; fee impact tied to platform positioning
- Platform delisting often cuts AUM 5-15% within a year
Suppliers Hold the Cards: High Pay, Data & Cloud Leverage Squeeze Neuberger Berman
Suppliers (talent, data terminals, cloud/GPU, compliance vendors, platforms) hold strong bargaining power over Neuberger Berman-high pay premiums (25-50%), Bloomberg revenue $11.5B (2025), cloud/GPU dependency >70%, dataset migration $50-120M, FY2025 AUM $427B; switching costs and regulatory risk keep supplier leverage high.
| Supplier | Key metric (2025) |
|---|---|
| Talent | 25-50% pay premium |
| Data terminals | Bloomberg rev $11.5B |
| Cloud/GPU | >70% capacity; migration $50-120M |
| Compliance tech | >70% managers ↑spend |
| Platforms | AUM $427B; delist -5-15% |
What is included in the product
Detailed Word Document
Concise Porter's Five Forces assessment of Neuberger Berman highlighting competitive rivalry, client bargaining power, supplier influence, threat of new entrants and substitutes, and identifying regulatory and technological disruptors that affect its fee margins and market positioning.
Customizable Excel Spreadsheet
A concise Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces snapshot that highlights competitive pressures and strategic levers-perfect for rapid portfolio or deal assessment.
Customers Bargaining Power
Institutional Client Fee Sensitivity and Mandates
Pension funds and endowments increasingly reject traditional active fees as passive ETFs control $10.5 trillion in US AUM (2025), forcing Neuberger Berman to cut fees; median active fee discounts reached 35% in 2025 for large mandates.
Large institutional buyers exert leverage to secure customized fee schedules and most-favored-nation clauses, reducing gross margins-Neuberger Berman reported investment management fee pressure in FY2025 with net margin contraction of ~120 bps versus 2024.
By 2026 these clients demand granular transparency and tailored reporting; servicing costs rose ~8% in 2025 for peer firms, forcing Neuberger Berman to deliver more reporting and client servicing at similar or lower fees.
Growth of the Outsourced CIO Model
The rise of the Outsourced CIO (OCIO) means Neuberger Berman often sells to sophisticated intermediaries that aggregate $2.5+ trillion industry-wide (2025 est.), not end-client boards, so pricing and mandate terms face institutional scrutiny.
OCIO firms run rigorous RFPs-winning managers are measured on fee compression and track record-forcing Neuberger Berman to accept tighter fees and bespoke reporting.
Consolidation gives OCIOs significant leverage: top 50 OCIOs control an estimated 60% of outsourced assets in 2025, shifting bargaining power toward intermediaries.
Retail Investor Mobility and Digital Platforms
Retail investor mobility rises as 2025 data show 76% of U.S. retail investors use zero-commission or robo platforms and $4.5 trillion flows through digital brokerages, so Neuberger Berman faces lower loyalty and faster redemptions.
Real-time fee and performance comparison tools mean clients can shift assets in minutes; industry churn rates hit 18% in 2025, forcing Neuberger Berman to continuously demonstrate outperformance and justify its fees.
Demand for Bespoke and Private Market Access
Wealthy individuals and family offices now demand private equity and private credit once limited to institutions, shifting bargaining power toward customers seeking uncorrelated returns; Neuberger Berman reported Alternatives AUM of $207 billion in FY2025, exposing a need to scale bespoke offerings quickly.
If Neuberger Berman misses niche outcomes, clients may flee to boutiques: 2024 HNW allocations to alternatives rose to 18% (Capgemini), up from 12% in 2019, underscoring urgency to innovate or lose fee-rich mandates.
- Alternatives AUM: $207bn (FY2025)
- HNW alt allocations: 18% (2024)
- Risk: client migration to boutiques
ESG and Values-Based Investment Requirements
Buyers now demand ESG-aligned mandates; 67% of global institutional investors in 2025 factor ESG into manager selection, so Neuberger Berman faces immediate mandate loss if criteria aren't met.
Major clients can withdraw mandates quickly-$200B+ of institutional AUM is sensitive to ESG terms-shifting negotiation power to customers.
Customers now set investment philosophy via contract terms, forcing NB to embed ESG across product lines or risk revenue hits.
- 67% of institutions use ESG in manager selection (2025)
- $200B+ AUM exposed to strict ESG mandates
- Immediate mandate withdrawal risk
OCIO Power Crushes Fees: 35% Discounts, $207B Alternatives & ESG Mandate Risk
Institutional buyers and OCIOs wield strong leverage-top 50 OCIOs control ~60% of outsourced assets (2025)-forcing Neuberger Berman to accept ~35% median fee discounts and bespoke reporting; Alternatives AUM $207bn (FY2025) and 67% of institutions use ESG screens, so mandate loss risk is material.
| Metric | 2024/25 |
|---|---|
| Alternatives AUM | $207bn (FY2025) |
| Passive US AUM | $10.5tn (2025) |
| Median fee discount | 35% (2025) |
| OCIO concentration | Top50 = 60% (2025) |
| Institutions using ESG | 67% (2025) |
Preview Before You Purchase
Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces Analysis
This preview shows the exact Neuberger Berman Porter's Five Forces analysis you'll receive immediately after purchase-no placeholders or samples; it's the full, professionally formatted document, ready for download and use the moment you buy.
